Rock History, What I Leave Out: David Bowie

August 26, 2008

Among the folks I leave out, David Bowie ranks highest in student requests.  Once I get a few semesters under my belt, get tired of teaching the same folks, and decide to switch things up, I’m sure I’ll swap him in, like a relief pitcher.

For now, though, I have several reasons to keep David Bowie on the alternate list.  First, his musical contributions are not as significant as one might think.  I can already hear complaints to this assertion, but hear me out:  Bowie’s best works contain a pastiche of musical styles, simultaneously referencing different eras and genres.  Aside from his Berlin work with Brian Eno, which helped to establish Eno as one of the best producers ever, much of this work is distinctly retro musically, while forward-looking in lyrics and performance.

Second, His adoption of different musical styles and personae throughout the years–Ziggy Stardust, the Thin White Duke, Berlin-Brian Eno-produced Bowie, elder statesman of alternative rock–doesn’t lend itself to easy characterization at a Rock 101 level.  But, at the same time, I already cover some bands that are doing similar things at the same time, though we don’t always think of them as being in the same realm as Bowie: gender bending, genre shifting, and issues of the border between art and pop also appeared in the music and performance of Led Zeppelin; George Clinton and P-Funk adopted fully-formed crazy spacemen characters at the same time, and their characters–Funk Messiahs from outer space–come with the benefit of acting as metaphors to address race in a post-Civil Rights Movement landscape.

Third–and this is the least valid reason, but I can’t change it–the class I teach falls into the category of “Intercultural North America.”  Its description focuses on rock & roll as an American form.  Thus, though I can of course cover some non-North American acts, my geographical focus tends to be the United States.  (Oh, poor Canada and Mexico!  I neglect you, too!  For there will be no Brian Adams or Corey Hart or even Alanis Morissette* in my course.  Or Los Tigres del Norte.)

Conversely, I can make a lot of arguments for including him when I do.  Although he’s never been as famous in the United States as he has in the UK, one could argue that no one else has been a greater influence on the visual and performative in rock music–on either side of the Atlantic–since 1970. Bowie’s gender-bending, super-weirdo-to-this-day Ziggy Stardust persona reinfused the overly “authentic” rock and roll of the late 1960s and early 1970s with a sense of showmanship.

Bowie’s contribution in terms of sexuality can’t be underestimated, either.  In a time when people actually thought that Freddie Mercury was straight,** Bowie declared his bisexuality.  Whether or not he really was/is whatever, this move, like Mercury’s often-overlooked declaration, blurred the edges of sexuality in rock performance.  This not only called into question the assumed heterosexuality of rock music as a genre, but also placed focus on how the masculinity that so many bands presented as “authentic” and “natural” was just as artificial and just as much of a performance.  On that topic, alone, we could probably spend a semester.

*Alanis Morisette will be the topic of my next “Rock History, What I Leave Out,” next Tuesday!

**Though Freddie Mercury told the NME he was gay in 1974, his audience often disregarded and remained unaware of his homosexuality.  One of his more-famous, oft-repeated quotes was, “I’m as gay as a daffodil, my dear!”


8 Responses to “Rock History, What I Leave Out: David Bowie”

  1. Graeme said

    About Freddie Mercury’s sexuality: I remember being surprised when I found out that he was gay, which I seem to remember being a big deal in the newspapers after he died – Looking back on it, I have no idea *why* I would have ever assumed he was straight, but apparently I was a very stupid child.

  2. Agent M said

    I don’t give a damn about who or what he was shagging, I love every damn thing about Freddie Mercury.

    David Bowie, whatevs.

  3. badcoverversion said

    Graeme: I always thought Freddie Mercury was gay, but that’s because my early exposure to Three’s Company reruns gave me an inkling as to what the term meant.

    Agent_M: Ah, there will someday be another “RH, WILO” on Queen!

  4. ddana said

    i have a soft spot for david bowie as a producer for iggy pop… and for velvet goldmine, but perhaps i digress too much?

  5. Graeme said

    Agent_M: “David Bowie, whatevs”??? Heresy! Dude, everything from, like, The Man Who Sold The World through Young Americans is awesome. After that, admittedly, he went a little crap. But still!

    With you on Freddie, though.

  6. Jenny said

    Dude, I can’t wait to hear your thoughts on Alanis. It sounds utterly dorky, but she got me through some rough times.

    Do you ever engage this slippery dimension of pop music with your students?–Y’know, the tendency to love (or hate) something simply because it’s related to a specific time, person, or place in your life? A love/hate that (presumably) transcends the actual aesthetics of the music? Is it fair to think of that kind of fandom/devotion/hatred as still being enough “about the music” to justify discussing it in a pop music class (versus a psych or perception or music therapy class, for instance)?

    I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on this, because if/when I ever teach pop music, I’d love to make this topic a centerpiece of the course.

  7. badcoverversion said

    Sometimes I do talk about the slippery associative aspects of pop music, but it’s often hard. As in, I don’t want to make the class about my own likes/dislikes, so when I introduce that topic, I want to make sure that it’s about something that we all do (and not about my irrational hatred for concept albums).

    I think you’d be a better person than I to talk about this, though! Want to do a guest spot sometime this semester?

  8. Jenny said

    I’d be honored!!!! Any time. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

I Will Start This Blog. I Mean It!

Adventures in cranky essays and rhyming poetry from an unlikely single mom.

musings on film, television, music, gender, identity, and everything in between...

The Seminar Table

learning / teaching / resisting


some of us are brave

modern disappointment.

A place to file your complaints. Submissions welcome.

Deb Werrlein


As the Adjunctiverse Turns

cheeky, no respect for academia

A Post-Academic in NYC

The PhD and Everything After


Wovon man nicht schweigen kann, darüber muss man sprechen.

when the devil leaves his porchlight on

Just another weblog is the best place for your personal blog or business site.

%d bloggers like this: